Home > So-So Media, The thing about writing > 3 things old-school Blogging can teach new-school Social Media

3 things old-school Blogging can teach new-school Social Media

September 7th, 2012 Leave a comment Go to comments

Back in 2003, my blog had a Google page rank of 9. I burst into the Technorati Top 1000 on a couple of occasions. Considering there were about 1000 of us blogging at that time, this accomplishment was not as “whoa!” as it sounds.

Before I started blogging in 2001, a Google search on my name delivered just 3 search results. Four years after, that number would climb to 300,000 and more. That was before businesses barged in, before smartphones and BYOD meant everyone really was “always on,” before becoming a ‘social media’ expert was a lucrative career option.

The act of blogging was quite different then. But the idea that there was value in talking to each other across the web has stood the test of time

There are things that early “social media” did right — practices that have been lost amid the growing cacophony of participants. The following are some old school blogging tactics that can be revamped to make conversations more meaningful today

THEN:
We had “blogrolls,” which we took great care to maintain, groom, and grow. These were sidebar lists of people we read, lists and links to friends, enemies, whoever we thought our friends should be reading. These were our pre-app apps for finding and sharing. We didn’t do SEO. We did I LOVE YOU.

NOW:
Blogrolls have fallen out of favor. Most of us find what we read by following links tweeted by our Twitter folowees, or Facebook links to what family and friends are reading. Blogs tend to link more to mainstream articles today, hoping to glean credibility and SEO juice in return. The problem with that is, Google’s analytics are smarter than any of us. And Google did, does, and always will reward authentic conversation. That is what has kept its search results useful over these many years. So don’t try to out-SEO Google. Try instead to read, care, and talk about what matters to you, then tell other people why you care about it, and why they should care.

THEN:
Most of us were blogging to get AWAY from our jobs, not as part of our jobs. Some of us were getting fired for blogging, and some others of us even made blogging careers out of getting fired for blogging.

NOW:
Blogging pays. Whether you are blogging about your personal hobby or about your professional passion, everyone loves a blogger. You are more likely to get laid off for not blogging than for blogging. In the process, however, bloggers have lost their authenticity of voice. How excited can you be about PR, really? Or technology? Or social media? It’s great that so many pundits have emerged from the ranks of blogging, and that so many have made careers out of it. But we really liked you best when you threw in the personal stuff, the parts about your kid’s visit to the principal, you dad’s final days in the hospital, the breakup with your longtime love. Don’t forget that stuff. It’s what makes this space special, me to you, the closest we get to flesh in pixels.

THEN:
Good conversations were the ones you couldn’t even trace the genesis of. So many people had blogged and linked to so many others, that the discussion became a web, a mini network of intellect or fart jokes within the larger network of nodes.We read other bloggers voraciously. We would seldom post without reading what other bloggers were saying. Links within a post were the only context we had. Links were organic to discussion. Links were a social grace. Links were etiquette. Linking to someone drew them into a discussion by virtue of the fact that you thought they were important enough to be there. That the conversation needed them. As readers we were concerned with the wattage of conversations, not the volume.

NOW:
The blogopshere is oversaturated with pundits and underserved by conversation. Bloggers think they deserve to be read. Instead of starting a discussion, they stake a claim. Just because you have a thought, however, doesn’t mean you’re a thought leader. Every idea doesn’t have to be yours. Everything you write doesn’t have to stand on its own. There are others in the blogosphere. You should invite them into your conversation by linking to something they’ve said about that same topic. Use links for context, talk with others, not at them.

  1. September 7th, 2012 at 19:18 | #1

    And comments. How about comments! Then, most of us permitted comments on our posts and people who commented really added value to the conversation. Yes, even the trolls added some value. Now, the comments seem mostly unassociated with the post, found in some ancillary twitter stream or beneath a Facebook (or G+) link to a post.

  2. September 8th, 2012 at 08:15 | #2

    good lord. I feel so retro, like I should comment on this and make sure I give you some trackback love! I wouldn’t mind a reset on the whole social media thing. Sure there was in-crowd stupidity, but no clueless, faux-expert douchbagery. Facebook seems to be mostly turning back in to AOL, location based stuff is just stupid and pinterest? WTF – sure, let me spend my time defining myself by unaffordable materialism.

  3. September 9th, 2012 at 18:41 | #3

    Curiously enough one of my closest friends and colleague (whom I met through her blog 4 years ago) were talking about this same issues. It started with the blogroll question, but all three points have been debated debated among us many times. We both started blogging as a hobby and both of us earn a leaving through it now (she more than I). We frequently joke about how we are “living the dream” we had when we had regular jobs in offices.

    Even so, we cannot avoid seeing that we have lost something along the way. Would we prefer doing something else? Not in your life. But the carefree days of blogging “just because” are sorely missed sometimes,

    Recieve a standing ovation from two bloggers in Mexico City.

    ¡Saludos y gracias! 😉

  4. September 9th, 2012 at 18:59 | #4

    ^here the closest colleague. No that we miss the good old days but is interesting finding how the blogosphere had changed in the last years. back in time I used to say “there is a place for everyone” -I blog about fashion- and nowadays I’m not so sure about it. I think before we were on a picnic and today we’re in a race and we, the old ones, have all the advantage because we learn the things you wrote in your post. And of course, old school blogging skills are terrific for my actual community manager job.

    I just love your post. Thanks to Angel for sharing.

  5. September 10th, 2012 at 06:42 | #5

    What great comments – and yes Frank – this reminds me of another thing “missing” in many of today’s posts — comments! That’s how we found new people to read, to add to the circle. New-School social media hasn’t come that far with comments. You would think with all the hubub about Disqus back in the day that comments would have come farther as a “value-add” for business social media.

    I am excited to see Angel and BoticaPop (new friends!) here, as well as my long-time blog bros, Frank and Jonathan.

  1. September 17th, 2012 at 07:28 | #1
  2. September 26th, 2012 at 14:32 | #2
  3. September 26th, 2012 at 15:02 | #3